Page 2 of 2
Re: Another ARK
PostPosted:Fri Nov 05, 2010 5:46 pm
by bug0
I do not see anything wrong in selling an antirk soft, if it is stabler than other free antirks and it does what it is supposed to do, where is the problem ?
Re: Another ARK
PostPosted:Fri Nov 05, 2010 6:23 pm
by EP_X0FF
bug0 wrote:if it is stabler than other free antirks
Stable in what? Kinda loud statement. Technical proofs please. What about "stable" part of KxRay, go to sysinternals->malware and search for 1 wonderful topic with bugreports and some childish behavior from kxray fan.
Re: Another ARK
PostPosted:Fri Nov 05, 2010 9:09 pm
by xqrzd
I agree whoever pays for this wasted their money. I can't even request an evaluation, the program dies: (I have more than 100gb of free HD space)
Re: Another ARK
PostPosted:Sat Nov 06, 2010 1:16 am
by Brock
xqrzd - SoftWorkz Innovation is the activation partner, take it up with them and inquire as to why it would report disk full falsely. Check the dna.dll file, it's not copyrighted to NoVirusThanks Company.
Re: Another ARK
PostPosted:Sat Nov 06, 2010 5:12 am
by EP_X0FF
This site does not provide advertising services for third-party paid programs, particularly if these programs are questionable (fast Borland IDE copy-paste) remakes of freely available tools.
Thread closed.